although someone here is not at all impressed with your engine choice!Īnd ACARS the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System was also introduced on the v1.5 release. v1.4 also gave you (another) cabin revamp and new GE engines, and then v1.5 dropped an experimental version of the RR Trent 1000 engines. The externals were again (if finally) updated in version 1.4 so any of the extensive list of earlier liveries now won't work and they went straight into the trash bin, so a completely new paintkit and anything past v1.5 now has to be redone, but all for the better mind you. The external design or modeling has gone through I think about three incarnations, as also has the internals, from average, to good, to far better. Users followed like devotes to some religion, but their dedication has been rewarded, if only by going the really long way around than a straight forward development process. what started out a small Dreamliner freeware project, became a payware project and then a sort of "Pro" (nee expensive) project. Either way X-Plane needs all the Dreamliners it can get, pilot's want to fly the latest aircraft and currently along with the Airbus A350-900 then the Dreamliner is it.īut the development process of Magknight's project has been a long one, if even a confusing one at that.
787 cockpit update#
Magknight has timely released their latest v1.6.0 version of the Boeing 787-900 Dreamliner, so was it just another update or a reaction to the announcement by FlightFactor, as that yes indeed their next "Pro" aircraft is going to be also a Dreamliner.
that report is down and in the "Flying the Boeing v1.6 Dreamliner" section of this review, the rest is as per the original report, only to note my departure airport was switched from BNE-Brisbane to MEL-Mebourne, so the original report section was based at BNE and the updated section is set at MEL and hence the differences. So I went back to the aircraft and flew it again, and three times over the same route to answer a few of my own questions. The review bothered me in several aspects, mostly I want you to get a realistic perspective on the aircraft, and from the perspective of the developer's development, that review had done neither, but the biggest nagging doubt was why the aircraft behaved as badly and as oddly as it did? But in this case with Magknight's Boeing 787-9, the aircraft didn't come out in the flying aspect very good at all, in fact it was awful, and it was a simply awful experience all round. I review as I see it, and that is good in the fact is what I see you can also see warts and all, the good and the bad. This is an updated review of the edition I published in early October (5th). Aircraft Review Update : Boeing 787-900 v1.6.0 by Magknight
0 kommentar(er)
